CSS English Essay Preparatory Classes
Prepare for CSS English: Essay Paper & Master the Art of Essay Writing with Riaz Laghari # ExcellenceSalient Features:
*Complete preparation of Essay
*Special FOCUS on Essay Writing and English Language (Grammar, vocabulary, usage)
* ESSAY preparation Targeting 70+ marks
*Grammar
*Vocabulary
*Timely ONE-TO-ONE Feedback on Written Essays on a weekly basis
*Practice papers to build students' confidence & ability
*Individual attention
*Test Series & Full-length Mock Exams + Grand Test
*EXPERIENCED Instructor
*Track record of achieving the highest MARKS
* Useful & effective exam tips
*Receptive-productive pattern of classroom activities
*Intensive group discussions
*Well-equipped and state-of-the-art spacious & ideally located campus in the heart of the city
*Public transport available from all parts of the twin cities
*LEARN THE TIPS, TRICKS & TECHNIQUES!
This Meticulously Designed Course Course Covers almost everything about CSS ESSAY!
Salient Features:-Candidates will receive Complete guidance on THE FOLLOWING TOPICS/AREAS::
-Characteristics/Traits/Ingredients/Essentials/Qualities of a Standard ESSAY
- Conceptual, Linguistic & Writing Competencies
-Selection/Choice of Topic, Articulation, Expression & Technical Treatment of Style Of Essay
- Sentence Structure, GRAMMAR/Mechanics
-Lexical Resource/Vocabulary/Diction
- Conceptual Clarity & Knowledge of Various Subjects(Expected Topic)
-Data Sources for Preparation of Various Topics
-Norms of Confrontational Discourse
-Paragraphing
-Format/Style
-OUTLINING
-Cohesion & Coherence
-Digression/Off-Topic/Irrelevant
- Dos & Donts
-Extensive Reading
-Holistic Approach
-Argument with Logical Reasoning form Multiple Angles supported by Substantial Evidence
-Content
-Language
-Intellectual signifier
-Monotony & Repetition
-Critical Thinking
-Comprehensiveness,Completeness,Correctness,Clarity,Cohesiveness,Cohesion
-Objective versus Subjective Approach
-Free of Errors
- Relevance
- Structure
- How to handle an Argument/Be Argumentative?
- Counter-viewing the argument
- Avoid superfluity
- English – figurative and metaphoric
- How to pitch your bias
- How to avoid spurious ideas
- How to show the difference between specific and general ideas
-Paragraph transition (most important)
- How to handle an Argument/Be Argumentative?
- Counter-viewing the argument
- Avoid superfluity
- English – figurative and metaphoric
- How to pitch your bias
- How to avoid spurious ideas
- How to show the difference between specific and general ideas
-Paragraph transition (most important)
-Proper beginning with a compact and elaborated topic sentence that must reflect the candidate's clear understanding of the topic.
-Correct and flawless language.
-Use of appropriate vocabulary
-Literacy and idiomatic expression
-Use of relevant terminology if needed
- Selection of relevant thoughts
-Logical organization of ideas.
-Coherence in the arrangement of material/paragraphs
-Cohesion in the development of argument reaching the conclusion
-Clarity in language, ideas, debate, and finish.
- Comprehensiveness)
-Logical presentation of the argument
-Standard sizing as per requirement
-Avoidance of too much scholarship
- Through acquaintance with the nature of the question i.e topic
- Quotation, when used, must be well placed and relevant
-Impressive finish
-A good essay is not supposed to reflect crammed information or bookish knowledge about the topic. It should rather tell us about the writer’s personal feelings or thoughts about it, and his ability to convert these feelings and thoughts into arguments for convincing the readers.
-It should be self-contained and self-explanatory: not depending on any outside source for its essential comprehension.
- Its basic stance should be creative, critical, and analytical rather than narrative or descriptive.
- It should contain a unified and coherent discussion on a particular topic (strictly in accordance with the wording of the title), with no digression or overshadowing.
- It should work through establishing the writer’s personal stand about the subject, and substantiating that stand with convincing arguments.
- It should be compact and concise, with no loose constructions or unnecessary attachments.
-It should have a balanced body, with a beginning, and middle and end-each one serving its own distinct purpose.
- It should work as a unit of impression in the sense that the impact of the beginning is still fresh when the reader reaches the end.
- It should be a fluent text with natural linkage among parts and paragraphs, with no disjointed or segregated parts.
- Answer the exact inquiry set, instead of displaying data that is comprehensively important to the theme.
- Have a reasonable contention or point of view, so the examiner knows from the start what the candidate means to state, and can follow the advancement of his/her contention all through the easy. - Be critical and analytical clarifying why something is critical, instead of basically depicting what scholars have said.
- Provide reasons, in view of soundproof, to help the primary contention.
- Have good paragraphing: the primary concern of each passage is presented unmistakably, and sections pursue sensibly from one another.
- Evaluate alternate points of view: it weighs up the relative worth or importance of various perspectives or speculations, assessing the key contentions and proof for these, and clarifying why one lot of contentions, reasons or proof is more persuading than others.
- Refer to speculations and ways of thinking important to the inquiry, showing comprehension of the criticalness of these to the subject.
- Include references: where applicable, careful references (names and dates).
-Be particular: it incorporates only the data and detail that is most applicable to responding to the inquiry, and forgets about less important material.
- Be composed unmistakably and to the point, without waffle, reiteration, stupendous speculations, bombastic language, superfluous language, or individual tales.
-Use of appropriate vocabulary
-Literacy and idiomatic expression
-Use of relevant terminology if needed
- Selection of relevant thoughts
-Logical organization of ideas.
-Coherence in the arrangement of material/paragraphs
-Cohesion in the development of argument reaching the conclusion
-Clarity in language, ideas, debate, and finish.
- Comprehensiveness)
-Logical presentation of the argument
-Standard sizing as per requirement
-Avoidance of too much scholarship
- Through acquaintance with the nature of the question i.e topic
- Quotation, when used, must be well placed and relevant
-Impressive finish
-A good essay is not supposed to reflect crammed information or bookish knowledge about the topic. It should rather tell us about the writer’s personal feelings or thoughts about it, and his ability to convert these feelings and thoughts into arguments for convincing the readers.
-It should be self-contained and self-explanatory: not depending on any outside source for its essential comprehension.
- Its basic stance should be creative, critical, and analytical rather than narrative or descriptive.
- It should contain a unified and coherent discussion on a particular topic (strictly in accordance with the wording of the title), with no digression or overshadowing.
- It should work through establishing the writer’s personal stand about the subject, and substantiating that stand with convincing arguments.
- It should be compact and concise, with no loose constructions or unnecessary attachments.
-It should have a balanced body, with a beginning, and middle and end-each one serving its own distinct purpose.
- It should work as a unit of impression in the sense that the impact of the beginning is still fresh when the reader reaches the end.
- It should be a fluent text with natural linkage among parts and paragraphs, with no disjointed or segregated parts.
- Answer the exact inquiry set, instead of displaying data that is comprehensively important to the theme.
- Have a reasonable contention or point of view, so the examiner knows from the start what the candidate means to state, and can follow the advancement of his/her contention all through the easy. - Be critical and analytical clarifying why something is critical, instead of basically depicting what scholars have said.
- Provide reasons, in view of soundproof, to help the primary contention.
- Have good paragraphing: the primary concern of each passage is presented unmistakably, and sections pursue sensibly from one another.
- Evaluate alternate points of view: it weighs up the relative worth or importance of various perspectives or speculations, assessing the key contentions and proof for these, and clarifying why one lot of contentions, reasons or proof is more persuading than others.
- Refer to speculations and ways of thinking important to the inquiry, showing comprehension of the criticalness of these to the subject.
- Include references: where applicable, careful references (names and dates).
-Be particular: it incorporates only the data and detail that is most applicable to responding to the inquiry, and forgets about less important material.
- Be composed unmistakably and to the point, without waffle, reiteration, stupendous speculations, bombastic language, superfluous language, or individual tales.
*By the end of this COURSE you will:
-Know what to expect when you take/SIT FOR THE EXAM;
-Have practiced PAST PAPERS & MODEL/GUESS PAPERS & CLASS TESTS;
-Have strategies to maximize your MARKS IN THE FINAL EXAM of CSS Essay, DEO VOLENTE!
To Register yourself WhatsApp/Call/Text NOW @ +923335704766
