"The purpose of Parliament will be to ensure Pakistan's survival."
The implication of this statement is that the judiciary is endangering Pakistan's stability, placing the parliament in a position of critical importance. This can be interpreted as an effort to undermine the judiciary's authority and justify the PMLN's control of the legislature.
The PMLN is presented as a democratic government that has been unfairly ousted from power in the past by the remark "against and again democratic governments are thrown out." It means that the judiciary is undemocratically active and biased against the PMLN.
"Some judges," not the judiciary, is what I'm referring to.
This claim makes a distinction between the judiciary as a whole and the particular judges who presided over the case. That implies that the activities of a select few people are what the PMLN is upset about, rather than the judiciary as a whole.
"Chief Justice wants to become, interior minister, government, parliament, minister of defense, and everything," the protestors yelled.
This claim makes the Chief Justice out to have a personal agenda and wants more power than is appropriate for a judge. It implies that the Chief Justice is dishonest and driven more by personal gain than by the interests of the nation.
"The highest judicial council must be consulted in the instances of these three judges."
The Supreme Judicial Council is mentioned as the proper entity to handle such things, which shows that the PMLN wishes to take action against the judges involved in the case. That suggests that the PMLN wants to make the judges answerable for their deeds and pursue justice.
A corrupt judge is being saved by the chief justice.
This claim implies that the judiciary is biased and corrupt and that the Chief Justice is shielding an unreliable judge.
"why wasn't the complete court formed?"
This claim implies that the judicial system is prejudiced towards the PMLN and challenges why a full court was not convened to hear the case.
The PMLN appears to be framing itself as the victim of an unjust, prejudiced, and undemocratic judiciary, according to the speech at this press conference. It implies that the judiciary is endangering national stability and paints the judges engaged in the case as corrupt and driven by personal benefit. This narrative delegitimizes the role of the court while legitimizing the PMLN's dominance of the parliament.
Data:
PMLN Quaid Nawaz Sharif Press Conference Against SC Verdict(4 April 2023)
Parliament will have to serve for the survival of Pakistan.
We have seen such things since 1953 when the first decision on the theory of necessity was given by the courts.
Against and again democratic governments are kicked out.
I am not talking about the judiciary but some judges.
This bench of three judges is not willing to agree to the four judges' verdicts already given.
Chief justice wants to become, the interior minister, government, parliament, minister of defense, and everything.
Everything is at stake for one person.
This is a one-man show.
It is a painful situation.
these people are responsible for this mess.
these three judges' cases must be referred to the supreme judicial council.
If we do something like this they say that you have violated the constitution but they are rewriting the constitution to hand over the Punjab government to Imran Khan.
We remind again and again.
the chief justice is saving a corrupt judge.
why the full court was not formed.
I urge people to wake up these people are destroying the country.
