Security Precarious Fragility: The Perilous Transformation of States
Outline:
1. Introduction
2. Vulnerability of a security state
3. An unstable, security-focused state runs the risk of turning into a terror entity
4. A state becomes fragile when security becomes its sole priority
5. The dangers associated with a state that is entirely focused on security
6. Bringing the Precarious Balance Back to Balance: Protecting States from Fragility
7. Strengthening the state's resilience and erecting barriers
8. Conclusion
Postscript/ Epilogue
Article
1. Introduction
When a state becomes overly focused on security and disregards other factors, it runs the risk of dangerously evolving into a terror-driven entity. Such a state's vulnerability to terrorism's provocation and eventual adoption of terroristic strategies and behaviors highlights how fragile it is. It is essential to restore balance within security-focused regimes, diversify their goals, and place an emphasis on values like justice, inclusion, and transparency in order to mitigate this risk.
2. Vulnerability of a security state:
When security takes precedence above all other considerations, an unstable state that prioritizes security runs the risk of becoming a terror organization. The vulnerability of such a state is made clear as it readily succumbs to terrorism, adopting terrorist strategies and traits. It is essential to regain the balance inside security-focused states in order to protect against this dangerous shift. The state's foundations can be strengthened and it can be protected from fragility by diversifying its tasks beyond security, taking into account social, economic, and political elements, and emphasizing fairness, inclusion, and transparency. States can defend themselves and sustain stability by taking a comprehensive approach, avoiding the risks connected with a security-only focus.
3. An unstable, security-focused state runs the risk of turning into a terror entity:
An unstable, security-focused state runs the risk of turning into a terror entity: A state which has security as its sole task and source of legitimacy is a fragile organism; it can always be provoked by terrorism to become itself terroristic” Giorgio Agamben – On Security and Terror
ایک غیر مستحکم، سیکورٹی پر مرکوز ریاست ایک دہشت گرد ہستی میں تبدیل ہونے کا خطرہ رکھتی ہے: ایک ایسی ریاست جس کا واحد کام سیکورٹی ہے اور قانونی حیثیت کا ذریعہ ہے ایک نازک جاندار ہے۔ یہ ہمیشہ دہشت گردی کے ذریعہ خود کو دہشت گرد بننے کے لئے اکسایا جا سکتا ہے" جارجیو اگامبین - سیکورٹی اور دہشت گردی پر
4. A state becomes fragile when security becomes its sole priority:
According to Giorgio Agamben, a state becomes fragile when security becomes its sole priority and the foundation of its legitimacy. Such a state is easily provoked by terrorist acts, which eventually causes it to adopt terrorist tactics and traits. Agamben draws attention to the inherent dangers and vulnerabilities that come with a state that is only motivated by security concerns.
5. The dangers associated with a state that is entirely focused on security:
A state's hazardous route toward pursuing security arises and is ripe for transformation into a terror-driven entity. As Giorgio Agamben maintains, the state's fragility becomes evident when security becomes the only goal and foundation of legitimacy. The state is propelled towards developing terroristic tendencies by terrorism, which functions as a catalyst. Agamben's observation prompts us to consider the trade-offs and effects involved while serving as a reminder of the dangers associated with a state that is entirely focused on security.
6. Bringing the Precarious Balance Back to Balance: Protecting States from Fragility:
It is crucial to establish balance within security-focused regimes in order to confront the dangers described by Giorgio Agamben. Beyond security alone, it becomes imperative to diversify the duties and sources of legitimacy. It is important to take a comprehensive approach that considers social, economic, and political factors in order to increase resistance to terrorist provocations. The state's foundations can be strengthened by emphasizing the ideals of justice, inclusion, and transparency, reducing the likelihood that it will fall to terrorist impulses. States should steer clear of fragility, promote stability, and guard against possible conversions into terrorism by developing a comprehensive framework that strikes a balance between security and larger societal ambitions.
7. Strengthening the state's resilience and erecting barriers:
Security-focused nations must critically reevaluate their priorities in light of their perilous fragility. Giorgio Agamben's thoughts shed light on the potential for security to turn into the exclusive responsibility and source of legitimacy, giving rise to terror entities. States can reduce the threats posed by terrorism by reestablishing balance and diversifying their duties. Strengthening the state's resilience and providing barriers against the appeal of implementing terrorist tactics requires placing a high value on justice, inclusion, and transparency. States should safeguard themselves from the dangerous road of fragility by pursuing a comprehensive strategy that goes beyond security alone, creating stability, and maintaining their integrity.
8. Conclusion:
In conclusion, a serious reevaluation of governmental objectives is necessary given the fragile fragility brought on by an overreliance on security. States can safeguard themselves from the dangers of becoming terror entities by using a holistic strategy that takes into account wider societal elements, diversifies tasks, and respects core ideals. States can construct a route towards stability, resilience, and the preservation of their essential principles by maintaining a delicate balance and protecting against the attraction of terrorism.
Postscript/ Epilogue:"I'm Explaining a Few Things" (or "Explico algunas cosas" in Spanish) by Pablo Neruda
"I'm Explaining a Few Things" (or "Explico algunas cosas" in Spanish) is a well-known poem by Pablo Neruda that explores the concepts of oppression and resistance. It is part of his acclaimed collection "Spain in Our Hearts" (Espaa en el corazón). The poem, which was composed in reaction to the Spanish Civil War, is an impassioned denunciation of the crimes carried out throughout the battle. In addition to expressing hope for freedom and justice, Neruda's lyrics powerfully portray the horrors of war and the oppression perpetrated upon the Spanish people. The poem "I'm Explaining a Few Things" is a potent example of how dedicated Neruda was to speak out against oppression and fighting for the rights and dignity of the oppressed.
The Nobel Prize in Literature was given to Pablo Neruda, whose real name was Neftal Ricardo Reyes Basoalto and who lived from 1904 to 1973. Shortly after his friend, the Spanish poet Federico Garca Lorca, was killed by Franco's fascists, known as the Nationalists (they actually made Garca Lorca dig his own grave), he penned this poem in 1936 while serving as Chile's consul in Spain. On September 23, 1973, roughly two weeks after Chile's democratically elected president, Dr. Salvador Allende, Pinochet's fascist thugs overthrew the country's legitimate government and installed a dictatorship based on terror and torture.
