The genesis of language!
"Colorless green ideas sleep furiously." Noam Chomsky(1957)
“Everything that man in the beginning heard, saw with his eyes, contemplated, and felt with his hands, was a living word. For God was the Word. With this Word in his mouth and in his heart, the origin of language was as natural, as near and easy, as child's play.”
― Johann Georg Hamann, Hamman’s Schrifte, Teil 4
“If Language is not correct, then what is said is not what is meant. If what is said is not what is meant, then what ought to be done, remains undone.” Confucius
“Poetry, whose material is language, is perhaps the most human and least worldly of the arts, the one in which the end product remains closest to the thought that inspired it.” Hannah Arendt
“Uttering a word is like striking a note on the keyboard of the imagination.” Ludwig Josef Johann Wittgenstein
The limits of my language means the limits of my world. Ludwig Wittgenstein
“Studying the world's oldest writing for the first time compels you to wonder about what writing is and how it came about more than five thousand years ago and what the world might have looked like without it.
Writing as I would define it serves to record language by means of an agreed set of symbols that enable a message to be played back like a wax cylinder recording.
The reader's eye runs over the signs and tells the brain how each is pronounced and the inner message springs into life.”
― Irving Finkel, The Ark Before Noah: Decoding the Story of the Flood
Origins of language
Linguists, anthropologists, and biologists are all very interested in the origins of language. While determining the precise first language uttered is difficult, most scholars assume that human communication emerged tens of thousands of years ago, research suggests roughly 70,000 years ago, albeit the timeframe varies depending on the theory.
Determining a precise first language is challenging!
Human speech most likely evolved gradually as a result of a mix of variables such as vocal imitation ability, social cooperation, and the desire to express information. Due to a dearth of written evidence from that historical period, determining a precise first language is challenging.
"mother tongue"
The term "mother tongue" refers to a linguistic standard rather than a gender or family impact. The term "mother tongue" refers to a person's first language, emphasizing the nurturing and foundational importance of language acquisition in early childhood. The term "father tongue" is not often used, which is most likely owing to historical and cultural standards rather than any underlying linguistic cause.
Decoding language origins
The genesis of language is a complicated subject. The question is whether there was an initial language or whether languages arose independently in distinct human communities. Decoding language origins is difficult due to a lack of concrete evidence. Language, unlike bones or objects, does not fossilize, thus scholars must rely on indirect indications from genetics, archeology, and comparative linguistics.
Deciphering the origins of language
Deciphering the origins of language requires piecing together diverse data, such as genetic research tracing human migration, archaeological discoveries, and linguistic study. However, because language most likely evolved during prehistoric times, tracing its precise roots remains uncertain.
Language
Language is an enthralling and ever-changing component of human mind and culture. picture its beginnings is a continuing task, requiring the integration of different disciplines to build a coherent picture.
How human speech evolved
The study of language origins is a difficult puzzle. Researchers are trying to figure out how human speech evolved throughout time, differentiating us from our closest relatives, chimps and bonobos. Human language is incredibly diverse and sophisticated, allowing for virtually endless expression and conversation on a wide range of topics.
Understanding the emergence of language
The origin of language is concerned with how the distinctive qualities of human language evolved. Human language, as opposed to animal communication systems, is distinguished by its complexity, flexibility, and ability to transmit abstract notions. Despite the difficulty of obtaining direct evidence due to the lack of language fossils, researchers pursue a variety of routes to better understand the emergence of language.
The following are some of the key aspects being investigated:
Physical changes:
The vocal tract is an important subject of research. The range of speech sounds could have been altered by changes in the vocal tract. These alterations, however, may not have marked the birth of language; they may have promoted faster and more expressive speaking.
Language evolution:
Some argue that language evolved gradually, maybe over millions of years, as a result of a sequence of changes in communication. Sounds could have been employed to label objects and actions at first. This could have led to combining words to form basic communications, such as "me Tarzan, you Jane." A more complicated grammar structure resulted from further development.
Cultural and genetic factors:
The question of whether language development was purely dependent on cultural evolution or if genetic changes in the brain were required is still being debated.
Relationship between human cognition and evolution:
Investigating what distinguishes humans from other primates, particularly in terms of intellect and communication capacities, yields critical insights.
The difficulties in this field originate from a lack of direct evidence and the complexities of language change. Researchers investigate this by looking at fossil records, genetic data, neurological investigations, and comparing animal communication systems.
For example, the FOXP2 gene mutation, which is linked to language and speech difficulties, first appeared roughly 200,000 to 100,000 years ago. While it may be tempting to call this a "language gene," it is significantly more complex than a simple cause-and-effect relationship.
Decoding the beginnings of human language remains a difficult task. Future advances in genetics, neuroscience, and transdisciplinary research may provide greater insights into the evolution of language and the distinctive cognitive capacities that distinguish humans.
A Journey Through Time to Unravel the Tapestry of Language Origins
The beginnings of human language have piqued the interest of researchers, who are interested in the evolution of human cognition and communication. Investigating the perplexing origins of language entails comprehending not just its inception but also what distinguishes human speaking from the communication systems of our closest cousins, chimps and bonobos.
The essential issue at the center of this study is, "How did the remarkable phenomenon of human language unfold?" The investigation isn't only about the evolution of current languages; it's also about how the human species got the ability to communicate in the first place.
Human language, an unmatched communication system, offers an unsurpassed breadth, allowing thoughts to be expressed over an endless range of themes. It's a tool for eliciting information, issuing commands, and even expressing negation—a feature lacking in other animal communication systems.
The beginnings of language are still shrouded in mystery, while estimates place the development at 70,000 years ago. This development was most likely the result of gradual evolution, affected by a variety of circumstances. Vocal mimicry, social cooperation, and the need to express information were all likely important factors in this complex process.
When considering the relative simplicity of animal communication systems, the language issue becomes much more enlightening. Most animals use a restricted variety of calls that are essentially concerned with immediate issues such as food, danger, or reconciliation. Even when call combinations exist, their meanings are not derived from the total of their parts.
Understanding the differences between human and chimp brains, particularly the evolutionary modifications that made human brains appropriate for language, is a critical component of this search. While the precise cause remains unknown due to a lack of evidence, studies show that crucial changes in the vocal tract may have happened, allowing for a greater spectrum of speech sounds.
The study of origins of language includes theories on its stages of development. It is thought that early communication may have involved identifying objects and behaviors before progressing to integrating words into basic messages. Such an incremental evolution may have resulted in the formation of a more complicated grammar structure.
The quest meets numerous challenges. With no ancient records of spoken languages and only a limited understanding of brain capacity provided by fossil skulls, evidence is limited. Nonetheless, genetic investigations and comparative analysis provide insights into the rich fabric of language evolution.
"language gene”
The FOXP2 gene mutation, which first appeared 200,000 to 100,000 years ago, tantalizes with a potential link to language evolution. While the gene's link to language and speech deficits is strong, it is only one piece of a much larger puzzle involving brain shape and language abilities.
The origins of human language remain a Herculean task. However, as the research thread continues to weave through genetics, neuroscience, and transdisciplinary disciplines, we get closer to unraveling the complicated and enthralling tapestry of human language origins.
Tracing the Evolution of Human Communication: Unveiling the Tapestry of Language Origins
Defining the Investigation: Investigating the Origins of Human Language
The study of the origins of human language revolves around a fundamental question: how did the human species evolve the unique ability to communicate? It is a quest to understand the origins of the exceptional talent for sophisticated communication, not just an investigation into the evolution of current languages.
Distinctive Ability of Human Language: A Comparison with Animal Communication Systems
When distinguishing human language from animal communication systems, it is clear that human language allows for unequaled expression, permitting thoughts on an unlimited number of topics. Human language, unlike animal systems, comprises not just information transmission but also negation and the ability to solicit information or give directives.
Timeline of Language Emergence: Tracing the Possible Origins of Language
According to estimates, human speech first appeared around 70,000 years ago, marking a watershed moment in human evolution. This emergence was most likely gradual, affected by elements such as vocal imitation, social collaboration, and the need to communicate information.
Understanding the Cognitive Differences Between Hominids and Chimpanzees
The search for the origins of language is dependent on distinguishing between human and chimp brains. Language-related modifications may have occurred not only in the brain's size but also in its character, defining its capacity for language-related tasks.
Sparse Evidence and Investigative Difficulties
The scarcity of direct evidence makes unraveling the enigma of language origins difficult. Spoken languages do not leave fossils, and fossil skulls provide only a limited understanding of brain capacity. Genetic studies and comparative analysis, on the other hand, act as guiding lights in this complex effort.
The FOXP2 Gene Mutation: A Piece of the Puzzle
The appearance of the FOXP2 gene mutation between 200,000 and 100,000 years ago suggests a relationship to language evolution. While the link between this gene and language and speech difficulties is intriguing, it is only one piece of a wider jigsaw involving brain anatomy and language abilities.
Decoding the Tapestry: Exploring Genetics and Neuroscience
As the search for language origins continues, it crosses over into genetics, neuroscience, and transdisciplinary research. The complicated fabric of human language beginnings eventually unravels, revealing insights into language's multidimensional evolution.
Darwin Correspondence Project
The origin of language
“Man has an instinctive tendency to speak, as we see in the babble of our young children, but no child has an instinctive tendency to bake, brew, or write.”
― Charles Darwin, The Descent of Man
Since the Victorian era, the origin of language has been a source of great speculation and controversy in the field of evolutionary studies. In the late 1830s, Darwin investigated animals' communicating capacities and their correlations between novel sounds and language. also acknowledged the vast differences between human and animal communication, but also recognized animals' ability to transmit feelings. Darwin observed similarities between natural sounds and specific words, highlighting their mimicry (Barrett ed., 1987, pp. 542-3, 568).
In the Victorian era, the argument over the origins of language covered several disciplines, including comparative philology, linguistics, philosophy, anthropology, and psychology. Darwin's colleagues and peers, such as Friedrich Max Müller and Hensleigh Wedgwood, developed competing theories. Müller, an ardent supporter of human language's uniqueness, argued for a supernatural origin of language, different from natural processes (Müller, 1861, 1: 22-3, 354).
Later, in Descent of Man (1871), Darwin articulated his ideas, recognizing language as a fundamental human trait while emphasizing its parallels with animal communication. Darwin postulated language evolution through natural and sexual selection based on data ranging from child language learning to animal behavior. He proposed that language originated by mimicking predator warning noises and melodic cadences for courting (Darwin, 1871, Descent 1: 61).
Ongoing disputes across numerous scientific disciplines continue to probe the presence of language centers in the human brain, monkey brain comparisons, and the evolution of linguistic capacities (Darwin Project).
Kenny Smith: "How Humans Got Language”
Kenny Smith will deliver his inaugural lecture, "How Humans Got Language." He digs into the difficulties of language evolution, highlighting its importance in understanding human evolution. Professor Smith's team at the Centre for Language Evolution has pioneered experimental and computational approaches to bridge this gap, despite the challenges of studying language evolution due to its ephemeral nature and the difficulty in discerning anatomical and neural changes in the archaeological record.
The researcher investigates the evolution of artificial linguistic systems by involving human participants in the learning and use of micro languages, as well as modeling populations of evolving language learners. They discovered that the fundamental structural characteristics of human language come from observable processes using these methods. Languages grow as people learn and communicate, making little adjustments and innovations that add together over time to form powerful, expressive linguistic systems. Surprisingly, the abilities required for this process are shared by our non-linguistic forebears, implying that the evolutionary modifications leading to language were quite little. Understanding the origin of this distinctively human attribute gives light on the similarities that exist between humans and their non-linguistic cousins.
"phenomenon of the third kind"
Linguists frequently regard language as either a cognitive or a social phenomenon, but it is truly both. It occurs in individual minds but is learnt through communication examples. This concept, known as a "phenomenon of the third kind," emerges as a result of both individual and community interaction. This viewpoint helps to explain perplexing events such as generalizations that are not explicitly represented in the minds of most speakers, such as genitive marking on masculine nouns in Polish and certain constraints on long-distance questions in English. According to the paper, speakers may acquire knowledge at various levels of abstraction: some extract abstract generalizations, while others rely on memorized examples or specific patterns. As a result, a realistic language approach should distinguish between patterns in how a community uses language (the social aspect) and patterns in the minds of individual speakers (the cognitive aspect).
Daniel Everett: How Language Began!
"How Language Began: The Story of Humanity's Greatest Invention," by Everett, is discussed in a series of science book discussions hosted by the Harvard Division of Science, Cabot Science Library, and Harvard Bookstore.
Everett contends that language existed prior to Homo sapiens, maybe dating back to Homo erectus.
He connects tools to the origins of language, claiming that they have symbolic and social aspects that go beyond mere functionality.
According to Everett, the presence of tools suggests the presence of culture, which indicates the presence of language.
Everett believes in the gradual theory of language evolution, which holds that language evolved over time rather than erupting suddenly.
He underlines that the platforms for language and symbols evolved throughout time, much beyond the Homo sapiens epoch, and rejects the idea of language's sudden creation.
“You can’t have a language unless you have a culture, and you can’t have a culture unless you have a language.” Daniel Everett
“The evolution of the platforms for language and symbols took evolutionary time and are not limited to Homo sapiens,” Daniel Everett
Language: The Cultural Tool Daniel Everett
Daniel Everett's work delves into the complex, multidimensional roots of language. He proposes that language arose from the intricate interplay of physical, cerebral, and cognitive aspects of human experience, which may have been impacted by environmental circumstances. Everett's investigation hints at the complexities and diversity of understanding how language arose.
Pirah Tribe & Language Origin:
The Pirah, an Amazonian tribe, speak a distinct Mura dialect, which connects to the region's foundations of language development.
Book Chapter Discrepancies and Language:
Everett's book contains discrepancies in chapter order, which may reflect the complexities of language's origins.
Everett's Platform Categories and Language Evolution:
Everett divides platforms into three types: physical, cerebral, and cognitive, which may reflect the diverse character of language's beginnings and evolution.
The discovery of de Saussure's manuscripts gives historical insights into the origins of language.
Skinner's Frames and Language Construction:
Everett's ideas are similar to Skinner's autoclitic frames, which shed light on how language may have evolved.
Language Intentionality and Environmental Influence:
Everett proposes that the environment may shape language intentionality, offering light on the environmental influences on language beginnings.
Linguistic Context and Behavior Analysis in Language Origin:
Everett's background is consistent with linguistic and behavior analysis notions, which could provide insight into language origin.
Everett's Use of Behavioral Terminology in His Work and Language:
Everett's use of terminology like "ground" and "figure" parallel notions used in behavior analysis, potentially revealing light on language development.
Language Origins and Everett's peculiar Use of "Contingency":
Everett's peculiar use of "Contingency" may provide a new viewpoint on language origin.
Everett investigates recursion, a critical aspect in language structure and potentially crucial in understanding its origin.
*Everett's Book Is Silent About Roberts' Work:
The absence of references to Roberts' work may indicate differing perspectives on the origins of language.(!)
Verb Suffixes and Language Origin:
Everett's example of verb suffixes provides insight into the structural evolution of language.
Language's Broader Definition and Animal Inclusion:
Everett's research implies that the definition of language may extend beyond humans, raising the possibility that it originated in other species.
Insights from Behaviorists on Language Origin:
Behaviorists like as Catania and Skinner dig into the origins of language, presenting possible insights.
Why Only Us: Language and Evolution by Robert C. Berwick and Noam Chomsky
Why Only Us: Language and Evolution by Robert C. Berwick and Noam Chomsky delves into the evolutionary story of language, drawing on modern linguistic theories. The book digs into the biological roots of the astonishing human ability to acquire language, as well as its evolution. The authors emphasize a change in definition of "language" that has allowed for a better understanding of its evolution, notably since the inception of the Minimalist Program. They study language from a biolinguistic standpoint, emphasizing its biological significance and computational efficiency as a system of thought. This study examines the contrast between Darwin's theory of progressive change with modern insights into evolutionary processes, using evidence from nonhuman animals, namely vocal learning in songbirds.
Impossible Languages By Andrea Moro
Andrea Moro's investigation of impossible human languages tries to define the essence of human linguistic capacities. Moro investigates whether such limitations exist by drawing analogies between biological principles that regulate animals and potential constraints in language. His research seeks to define the boundaries within which languages work by identifying shared qualities among various languages. He unravels syntax's dense tapestry, likening it to the hidden side of a garment, and uses scientific investigations to reveal these hidden structures. Moro's analogy of words and sentences to symphonies and constellations highlights their reliance on our observation for survival. Finally, his work depicts language as an important component of human cognition, deeply linked into our perception of the world.
Is it feasible to have an impossible human language? A scientist might define an impossible animal as one that defies natural physical rules (such as entropy or gravity). Are there any laws that limit the use of languages? Andrea Moro, a renowned linguist and neuroscientist, analyzes the potential of inconceivable languages in this book, looking for the irreversible "fingerprint" of human language.
Moro demonstrates how the concept of impossible languages has influenced research on the ultimate goal of linguistics: to determine the class of possible human languages. He leads us beyond Babel's walls, to the collection of features that, contrary to appearances, all languages share, and investigates the sources of that order, depending on scientific tests he helped create. Moro likens syntax to the back side of a tapestry, which reveals a hidden yet seemingly sophisticated structure. He compares the brain to a sieve, discusses the reality of (linguistic) trees, and records electrical activity in the brain to listen for the sound of thought. Words and words, he says, are like symphonies and constellations: they don't exist on their own; they exist because we listen to and look at them. We are a component of the data.
Moro, A. (2023). Impossible Languages [Introduction]. The MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262549233/impossible-languages/
Language in Our Brain: The Origins of a Uniquely Human capabilities, by Angela Friederici
Language in Our Brain: The Origins of a Uniquely Human capabilities, by Angela Friederici, deconstructs the neurological underpinnings of language, demonstrating how species-specific brain differences may explain our unique linguistic capabilities. This fundamental work illuminates the complicated network of phonological, syntactic, and semantic components inside language, as well as their integration. Friederici maps the neural landscape across human and monkey brains, revealing specific brain regions important for language as well as the structural and functional connections that allow for quick linguistic computations. She discovers a white matter dorsal tract unique to mature human brains and only weakly present in other primates, and proposes it as a possible explanation for human language aptitude.
The Evolution of Language by W. Tecumseh Fitch
According to Fitch (2010), the origin and evolution of language is a profoundly challenging scientific puzzle. This is because there is a dearth of direct, clear data and a requirement for insights from many fields that lack a shared context. Understanding language evolution necessitates significant insights into issues such as "meaning," which has long been a source of contention in philosophy and linguistics.
Fitch claims that the best approach to define language is still debatable, and he advocates for a multi-component view of language evolution, warning against focusing on a single core element. In evolutionary exchanges, he promotes a broad comparative approach across animals, dismissing human exceptionalism.
Fitch emphasizes the importance of solid theories to distinguish disparities in brain function while discussing the neurological and genetic components of language. He advocates for open-mindedness and empirical data while encouraging skepticism toward concepts.
Fitch(2010) opined, “It has been suggested that the evolution of human language is “the hardest problem in science” (Christiansen and Kirby, 2003) and some skeptics have credibly concluded that scientists might spend their time more constructively on more tractable topics (e.g. Lewontin, 1998). Certainly, the scientific approach to language evolution faces unique difficulties. Language does not fossilize, and we lack time machines, so all of our data are indirect, and often several steps removed from the direct, conclusive evidence we might desire. But this is true of many problems in science that are considered legitimate pursuits, from the Big Bang to the origin of life, so this difficulty is not insuperable. More problematic is the fact that understanding language evolution requires new insights in multiple, independent disciplines which lack a shared framework of terminology, problems, and approaches. For example, a complete understanding of language surely requires a clear understanding of “meaning” – but the nature of meaning is one of the most perennially controversial issues in philosophy and linguistics (cf. Jackendoff, 2002;Hurford, 2007). A biological understanding of meaning would surely entail a full understanding of how brains generate, represent, and manipulate concepts, and such a broad understanding of cognitive neuroscience remains a distant hope today (some pessimistically suggest it is forever beyond the reach of the human mind; McGinn, 1991). Though aware of these (and other) difficulties, I am more optimistic. Indeed, I believe that recent, profound progress in the biological sciences, combined with insights from many other fields including linguistics, psychology, paleoanthropology, and philosophy, offer the hope that fundamental progress in understanding these questions will be made in the next few decades (Fitch,2010., pp.15-16).”
According to Fitch (2010), “Unfortunately, the correct way to subdivide language remains a subject of considerable debate (cf. Pinker and Bloom, 1990; Jackendoff, 2002). One influential breakdown was provided long ago by the American linguist Charles Hockett (Hockett, 1960, 1963). Hockett conceived of language as a collection of “design features” suited to different tasks, some shared with animal communication and others unique to language”(p. 18).
Fitch(2010) also stated, “Chomsky argued that the proper focus for a biologically grounded theory of linguistics was the neural/cognitive system existing within an individual. He termed this system, a property of the mind/brain of that individual, “internal” language, or “I-language.” In contrast, the “languages” studied by historical linguists, properties of populations of individual speakers, were termed “external,” or “E-language.” Chomsky argued forcibly that E-language provides a poor focus for linguistic study. E-language is simply an aggregate epiphenomenon, no more than the output of a set of I-languages, in which case we should study the more basic unit of I-language (p.32)”
Fitch(2010) also stated, “The evolution of cooperative communication: solving a central problem No instinct has been produced for the exclusive good of other animals, but . . . each animal takes advantage of the instincts of others. (Darwin, 1859) (p.414)”
Fitch(2010) also stated, “It is not the mere power of articulation that distinguishes man from other animals, for as everyone knows, parrots can talk; but it is his large power of connecting definite sounds with definite ideas, and this obviously depends on the development of the mental faculties” (p. 54). The capacity for language is found in the brain, not in the vocal tract. Finally, Darwin observes that language “is not a true instinct, as every language has to be learnt. It differs, however, from all ordinary arts, for man has an instinctive tendency to speak, as we see in the babble of our young children” (p. 55). As Marler (1991b) has put it, language is not an instinct, but an “instinct to learn.(p. 471)”
Fitch (2010) promotes a multi-component theory of language evolution, cautioning against focusing on a single core ingredient. In evolutionary talks, he promotes a broad comparative approach across animals, discounting human exceptionalism.
In discussing neurological and genetic elements, he emphasizes the importance of strong theories to distinguish differences in brain function. He promotes skepticism toward ideas while advocating for open-mindedness and empirical data.
Fitch forecasts a spike in data collecting to test hypotheses, with major advances expected within the next two decades. This perspective highlights the field's developing nature and the significance of a complete, empirical approach to language evolution (Fitch, 2010).
In conclusion, Fitch's research emphasizes the intricacies and interdisciplinary nature of the study of language evolution. He favors a broad, scientific approach, encourages skepticism, and anticipates considerable advances in the discipline in the next years. This reflects the continual quest for a better understanding of language's origins and development.
Goals of the book:The Evolution of Language
Fitch's goal was to provide a complete discussion of numerous ideas and viewpoints on language evolution, emphasizing the need of readers drawing their own conclusions rather than arguing for a particular theory.
Hypotheses of Various Types:
There are numerous competing ideas about language evolution, implying that no single hypothesis is completely convincing. This variety demonstrates the importance of combining novel ways to resolve current debates.
Protolanguage Approaches:
Fitch identifies the virtues and shortcomings of various protolanguage models (gestural, melodic, and lexical) and argues for a holistic model that embraces rather than contradicts many perspectives.
The Evolutionary Role of Gesture:
Fitch believes that speech and gesture interacted during human evolution, and that gestures played an important role in communication throughout hominid evolution.
Convergence of Data and Genetic Research:
The integration of data from other disciplines, particularly genetics, will be critical in settling disagreements about the evolution of cognitive traits. The examination of genetic data provides insights into the order of appearance of various cognitive capacities during hominid evolution.
Evo-Devo and Comparative Approach:
The discoveries in evo-devo and the conservative character of vertebrate development provide a broader scope for researching cognitive processes at both mechanistic and adaptive levels, adopting a broad comparative approach across species.
Data-Driven Approach:
Fitch highlights the importance of a data-driven, hypothesis-testing approach to addressing the myriad outstanding questions in language evolution. He gives examples of open problems and the types of data needed to evaluate the various possible options.
Interdisciplinary Collaboration:
Fitch emphasizes the importance of more interdisciplinary collaboration, respect for differences, and better understanding in order to progress the scientific, data-driven study of language evolution.
A Multifaceted Approach to Language Evolution:
Fitch advocates for a pluralistic, multi-component view of language evolution, emphasizing that many traits contribute to language complexity collectively. He cautions against believing any single aspect to be the essence of language, comparing it to the tale of the blind men and the elephant, in which each part is essential.
A Comprehensive Comparative Approach:
Understanding the evolutionary features of language requires a broad comparative approach across many species. It stresses the shared components of different clades as well as the significance of convergent evolution in understanding adaptation and limitations.
Rejecting Human Exceptionalism:
In language evolution arguments, Fitch argues against human exceptionalism, emphasizing the need for a broader comparative study program that includes other species rather than focusing primarily on humans.
Language's Neural and Genetic Foundations:
It is highlighted the significance of acknowledging ignorance on critical subjects such as the neurological and genetic roots for language in the human brain. Fitch believes that sophisticated neurolinguistic theories, combined with genetic advances, will aid in the discovery of specific variations in human and animal brains relevant to language processing.
Skepticism and intellectual curiosity:
Fitch encourages skepticism toward established theories and emphasizes the importance of remaining receptive to valid arguments, even if they contradict instinctive views. Without sufficient scientific proof, intuition is regarded as beneficial in developing hypotheses but in deciding among several possibilities.
The Problems of Language Evolution:
Fitch sees language evolution as a collection of interconnected problems, each handled by a different hypothesis. He invites readers to build and test different ideas because no single hypothesis can answer all of the difficulties.
Data Collection and Prospects for the Future:
Predictions offered by the book's ideas provide recommendations for accumulating critical evidence about neurological mechanisms, genetic bases, and gene evolution timing. Fitch anticipates a deluge of such data in the next decades, which will aid in the construction of a robust theoretical framework to empirically examine the many possibilities.
Conclusion and Future Directions:
Fitch recognizes the fast changing subject of language evolution, emphasizing the multitude of hypotheses and views but the scarcity of definite findings. He is optimistic about the prospects for real scientific development over the next two decades, based on an empirical, hypothesis-testing approach that embraces a comparative, multi-component perspective.
Fitch's perspectives on the complexities of language evolution, the necessity for a diversified perspective, and the direction of future research, the importance of rigorous empirical testing to advance the field of inquiry.
(Fitch, 2010, pp. 508-512)
Denn der Mensch, als Tiergattung, ist ein singendes Geschopf, aber ¨ Gedanken mit den Tonen verbindend ¨ . (p. 76, Wilhelm von Humboldt, 1836) How did man become, as Humboldt somewhere defined him, ‘a singing creature, only associating thoughts with the tones’? (p. 437, Otto Jespersen, 1922).
Exploring the Tunisian Dialect and its Phonetic Mapping to Preserve Cultural Identity
Our relationship to our culture is shaped by the language we speak, which is influenced by history, traditions, and other factors. This effect varies among regions, giving rise to distinct dialects with distinct lexical, syntactic, or phonetic characteristics utilized by specific people or in specific localities. The Tunisian dialect, which is gaining popularity in the media, is undergoing changes, with some idioms becoming uncommon among specific groups or regions as a result of social and cultural upheavals. The first section of this study discusses fieldwork experiences detailing the Tunisian dialect in over 250 areas, based on recordings from 3000 speakers. The second section introduces an automated approach that maps the phonetic system of the Tunisian dialect, which is essential for comprehending dialect changes across geographical locations. The purpose is to study and maintain these dialects so that they can be passed down through generations.
Conclusion: Human Evolution is an Ongoing Journey
The search for language origins remains a tough task. However, as researchers work their way through genetics, neuroscience, and transdisciplinary studies, the once-mysterious roots of human language are gradually coming into focus, exposing the complicated and fascinating path of language evolution.
SOME Hindus had brought an elephant for exhibition and placed it in a dark house. Crowds of people were going into that dark place to see the beast. Finding that ocular inspection was impossible, each visitor felt it with his palm in the darkness. The palm of one fell on the trunk. ‘This creature is like a water-spout,’ he said. The hand of another lighted on the elephant’s ear. To him the beast was evidently like a fan. Another rubbed against its leg. ‘I found the elephant’s shape is like a pillar,’ he said. Another laid his hand on its back. ‘Certainly this elephant was like a throne,’ he said.
The sensual eye is just like the palm of the hand. The palm has not the means of covering the whole of the beast. – From Rumi’s Tales from the Masnavi (translated from Persian by A. J. Arberry)
Plato “Allegory of the Cave” (The Republic, Book VII, 514a-521d)
Socrates conjures a striking analogy in Plato's allegory of the cave, depicting humans who have been locked within a cave since childhood. They are shackled and face a wall, oblivious to the world beyond them. The glow of a fire casts shadows of objects carried by unseen persons. These shadows are perceived as reality by the prisoners, who are unaware of the genuine things that are creating the shadows. When a prisoner is released and confronted with bright light, he or she refuses to comprehend the newfound reality outside the cave. Gradually adjusting to light, the freed prisoner recognizes genuine objects, eventually grasping the sun's splendor and true nature. However, when the once-free individual returns to the cave to enlighten others, they are met with rejection and derision, their wisdom perceived as destructive.
The cave represents our restricted senses in this metaphor, which represents the path from ignorance to enlightenment. The philosopher must not only achieve enlightenment, but also communicate wisdom by navigating between worlds in order to advance understanding.
This tract which the river of Time
Now flows through with us, is the plain.
Gone is the calm of its earlier shore.
Border'd by cities and hoarse
With a thousand cries is its stream.
And we on its breast, our minds
Are confused as the cries which we hear,
Changing and shot as the sights which we see.
—------------------------------------------------------------------
But what was before us we know not,
And we know not what shall succeed.
The Future by Mathew Arnold
References:
Alter, Steven G. 2005. William Dwight Whitney and the science of language. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Arnold, M. (n.d.). The Future. Poetry Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/43590/the-future
Berwick, R. C., & Chomsky, N. (2017). Why Only Us: Language and Evolution. The MIT Press. (9780262533492)
Bickerton, Derek. 1990. Language and species. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cheney, Dorothy, and Robert Seyfarth. 2007. Baboon Metaphysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dąbrowska, E. (2020). Language as a phenomenon of the third kind . Cognitive
Linguistics, 31(2), 213-229. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2019-0029
Darwin Correspondence Project.(n.d.). The origin of language. Retrieved from https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/commentary/human-nature/origin-language
FAQ: How Did Language Begin?
Fitch, W. (2010). The Evolution of Language (Approaches to the Evolution of Language). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511817779
Friederici, A. D. (2017). Language in Our Brain: The Origins of a Uniquely Human Capacity. The MIT Press. (9780262036924)
Hauser, Marc. 1996. The evolution of communication. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Hurford, James R., Michael Studdert-Kennedy, and Chris Knight, eds. 1998. Approaches to the evolution of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Moro, A. (2023). Impossible Languages. The MIT Press. (9780262549233)
Plato. ( 1943). Plato's The Republic. New York :Books, Inc
Pinker, Steven 1994. The language instinct: the new science of language and mind. London: Allen Lane.
Smith, Kenny - How humans got language
Wahiba, Ben Abdessalem. "Language: A Phenomenon of Culture and Communication, Preserving the Language Through a Phonetic Map" (2008). MCIS 2008 Proceedings. 9.
[Link to the paper: https://aisel.aisnet.org/mcis2008/9]
