Do Schools Kill Creativity? by Sir Ken Robinson explores the following crucial themes:
Sir Ken Robinson says that we should encourage children to be creative since it is just as vital as reading.
He contends that the existing educational system lacks originality and innovation since it is built on an industrial model that was created for a previous period.
Divergent thinking is the ability to develop various thoughts and see multiple options. Robinson explores the significance of this concept. He contends that the educational system frequently encourages convergent thinking, which is centred on obtaining the appropriate response.
Standardized testing's effects include a restricted focus on some topics and the neglect of others, including the arts, according to Robinson, who claims that testing has taken centre stage in education.
Robinson argues that we need to reevaluate education and develop a new model that fosters creativity, innovation, and a variety of abilities.
Robinson gives examples of successful creative people who did not conform to the expectations of conventional education, such as Paul McCartney and Richard Branson.
The role of the teacher: According to Robinson, instructors should have more freedom to express their own creativity and innovation as well as to encourage their pupils' creativity.
The significance of acting:
Robinson stresses the significance of acting to change the educational system and establish one that honours and encourages innovation. He proposes that this can be accomplished by making adjustments to the curriculum, policy, and teacher preparation.
Robinson contends that the existing educational system is failing to adequately prepare students for the opportunities and difficulties of the twenty-first century and that this has important ramifications for society as a whole. To ensure that people and society can prosper in the future, he contends that a new educational paradigm is required.
Source: Do schools kill creativity? | Sir Ken Robinson